Re: R65. Who wins?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Zh|l
In this thread, Butcher proves why he should never be left in charge of politics or have any bearing in decisions based on them.
Attacking in this game isn't always down to the most profitable in roids. Ult are notorious for bouncing back after being roided down, so any serious coalition have to hit Ult for reasons other than roid profit in order to achieve the aim of knocking Ult out the top spot.
What seems to confuse people is why alliances not aiming to win or destined for number one get involved. The simply answer is because they generally get dragged into these things naturally. Sure, they may not have an investment in wanting to drop an alliance down, but to sit on the sidelines alone and with no friends is a death sentence in this game.
Also, too many 'top alliances' have ignored these smaller alliances before which is why IMO those in higher positions need to "touch base" with these other alliances more and more rather than discounting them as no threat.
|
You aer an evil fury blocker!!!!!!11111122
__________________
"Build a man a fire, and he'll be warm for a day. Set a man on fire, and he'll be warm for the rest of his life."
|