Quote:
Originally Posted by [JungleMuffin]
Planets being able to land 60k XP a day is entirely about the XP formula being broken, not politics. Top 10 planets on t300 roids outscoring the planets with t3 roids is entirely about the XP formula being broken, not politics. Planets crashing 1m value for profit is entirely about the XP formula being broken, not politics. Every alliance in the game going 3x attack instead of defending, because of XP landing provides massively more score than holding roids, is entirely about the XP formula being broken, not politics.
There has always been blocks in PA, that wasn't what caused allies to do away with defending, and any argument that it is so, is blatantly disingenuous.
Arguing that the XP formula is weaker than ever before 'in your opinion' is just flat out horse shit and reinforces that you're an idiot. Change logs support that.
As for the references to Rainbows...noone cares about them, they're an irrelevant alliance.
|
I remember bows winning couple rounds ago?!
Anyway, we probably played a different round. Weird stats facts u bring now.