Thread: Alliance size
View Single Post
Unread 5 Sep 2015, 22:52   #50
ArcChas
General (Adjective Army)
 
ArcChas's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Yorkshire, England.
Posts: 825
ArcChas has much to be proud ofArcChas has much to be proud ofArcChas has much to be proud ofArcChas has much to be proud ofArcChas has much to be proud ofArcChas has much to be proud ofArcChas has much to be proud ofArcChas has much to be proud of
Re: Alliance size

I'm not going to bother trotting out all the reasons why the "smaller tags would be great" faction is wrong. Please read the earlier threads for that.

However, I'll remind you of two of them:
1/ Who is going to run (all) these new alliances that you think will magically appear when tag sizes are reduced?
2/ What happens to the (suddenly) "surplus to requirement" players from the existing alliances? Bear in mind that these will not be the keenest or most active players in those alliances.

When you can provide credible answers to those questions please resume your call for tag sizes to be reduced. Until then, please, for the love of God, give it a rest.
__________________
Amnion (aka The Arcane Chas of Arcania) - Playing PA under those and other pseudonyms every genuine round since Round 2. Most recently (and insignificantly):
Onset of Apathy R94 | Stacks of Resources R95 | The Necromancer of Dol Guldur R96
70 Years of Queen Elizabeth R97 | Worst of The Worst R98
Knights of the Green Shield R99 | Look Out of The Window R100 | Most of All R102
Hard of Hearing (2:7:1) R103 | The Lateness of Your Application (1:6:6) R104 | Kinnison of Tellus (5:1:2) R105
ArcChas is offline   Reply With Quote