Quote:
Originally posted by hyfe
You're right. The chance of the total disastrous no roid-outcome is however slightly higher when doing the more scans alternative. So it all depends on what definition of 'risky' you use 
Code:
Roids: 5 5
Amps: 15 10
Scans: 10 15
Varians: 0,019 0,018
0 roids%: 0,004 0,001
and yes: god bless excel  (or any other politically correct GNU'ish spreadsheet)
|
That is poor statistics as with 15 scans and only 10 amps you can never get over 10 roids. So your last 5 scans are wasted. That makes for lousy variance indeed. You should only compare combinations where the number of amps at least match the number of scans.
hAl