|
Re: rd 40 predictions... go go go
Quote:
Originally Posted by DarkHeart
emphasis on the word no
A logical conclusion from the word no would be no, so i dispute lights ability to draw logical conclusions from a set of facts!
|
You know, that saying 'no' does not mean sarcasm. In his post, he was implying that he made that prediction seriously but it was before the block formed.
So, i'll show you the logic as you cant seem to follow it:
1. GM Makes a Prediction
2. Light takes the piss out of the prediction
3. AngryDuck says GM wasnt being serious he was just being sarcastic
4. GM says he was being serious
5. Light tells AngryDuck that GM himself says he was being serious
GM saying 'no' after his post, where he's saying that his prediction isnt written in stone or that his post could of been made to make us think CT was weak.. Isnt sarcasm.
__________________
First shalt thou take out the Holy Pin. Then shalt thou count to three, no more, no less. Three shall be the number thou shalt count, and the number of the counting shall be three. Four shalt thou not count, neither count thou two, excepting that thou then proceed to three. Five is right out. Once the number three, being the third number, be reached, then lobbest thou thy Holy Hand Grenade of Antioch towards thy foe, who, being naughty in my sight, shall snuff it.
|