Quote:
Originally posted by ComradeRob
The best argument against it was that the people who would best be able to afford the support costs would be the people with the most roids. In other words, it would punish those who lose roids more than those who don't.
|
This is a total crap argument. People with more roids have an advantage over people with less ? Wow, that is what this game is all about !!!
Also you are incorrect as such a measure has an effect on your score percentagewise it means actually that if you two players have the same ratio (score/roids) but are of hugely different size than after maintenace costs or after scrapping a small part of their fleet they wil still have the same score/roids ratio !!! So actually it is of no consequence if you are big or small really.
hAl