Thread: Support Planets
View Single Post
Unread 25 Jul 2006, 02:46   #39
Veedeejem!
Hibernating
 
Veedeejem!'s Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Team Kesha
Posts: 1,621
Veedeejem! has a reputation beyond reputeVeedeejem! has a reputation beyond reputeVeedeejem! has a reputation beyond reputeVeedeejem! has a reputation beyond reputeVeedeejem! has a reputation beyond reputeVeedeejem! has a reputation beyond reputeVeedeejem! has a reputation beyond reputeVeedeejem! has a reputation beyond reputeVeedeejem! has a reputation beyond reputeVeedeejem! has a reputation beyond reputeVeedeejem! has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Support Planets

The poll is useless, but i still voted for all is fair in love and war. Atleast till we get a clear definition of what a support planet really is.
For me it's a planet attacking with an alliance, defending that alliance or a farm (ships and/or roids).
Anything else like example cov-op planets, scanners, the not playing res donating planets 1up had last round (this one is a gray one for me as the alliance sure did gain alot of resources from those planets, but pa-team allowed it so...) are not support planets.
Sure, cov-oppers can do damage, but if you look at it that way scanners do damage too, making all those scans that tells the enemy exactly whats going on. And both can be stopped, either by building sec centres or jammers. Does that mean we have to close all out of tag scanners & cov-oppers? Why not close every person not in an alliance aswell while we're at it caus they can cov-op, scan and attack aswell.

(sorry if my post isn't that structurised but it's almost 4am over here, what do you expect?)
__________________
[InSomnia]
Official designated driver

[ToF] - [eXilition] - [Rock] - [Denial] - [DLR] - [eVolution] - [ODDR] - [HR] - [Ultores] - [Apprime] - [Ironborn]
Veedeejem! is offline   Reply With Quote