Quote:
Originally Posted by BloodyButcher
Will the top 100 list be much diffrent with bigger tags?
And most players are in the alliance where they feel the most home.
Im not sure how many rounds its been since a new alliance won, but it is over 10 for sure.
Its more important to keep this game evolving than satisfing a few old players.
|
Ermmm... how does this reply have any revealance to the point i was making...
Instead of the 8+ full tags you have atm you will end up with 4 100 man tags and 5-6 30 man tags. The 30 man tags will be farms for the 100 man tags. Remember the communities of ND and HR are vastly larger than the 60 that the game currently allows. Lots of their communties play in other 'smaller' tags just to play the game. If ND or HR was given another 40 places or heaven forbid unlimited places then these are likely 2 alliances that would scoop the heart of out of some of the lesser tags leaving them to be farmed.
If a top alliance (Im thinking Ultores/Vikings mainly) said they 'were going FTW!' then you would see mass applicantions as people would wanna have a slice of the victory pie.
In the current round looking at the KIA you have 9 basically equal and competitive alliances, proper community alliances. Why would you want to change this? If anything the evening out of alliances in the last few rounds (actually mainly due to the emergence of Spore which seems to have balanced the political ship) has made for vastly better politics, more exciting rounds and really close run races in all 3 forms which someone can win in this game.
Why change what currently isnt broke?