Thread: is thinking about children sexually wrong?
View Single Post
Unread 26 Nov 2004, 21:29   #19
Dante Hicks
Clerk
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Posts: 13,940
Dante Hicks has ascended to a higher existance and no longer needs rep points to prove the size of his e-penis.Dante Hicks has ascended to a higher existance and no longer needs rep points to prove the size of his e-penis.Dante Hicks has ascended to a higher existance and no longer needs rep points to prove the size of his e-penis.Dante Hicks has ascended to a higher existance and no longer needs rep points to prove the size of his e-penis.Dante Hicks has ascended to a higher existance and no longer needs rep points to prove the size of his e-penis.Dante Hicks has ascended to a higher existance and no longer needs rep points to prove the size of his e-penis.Dante Hicks has ascended to a higher existance and no longer needs rep points to prove the size of his e-penis.Dante Hicks has ascended to a higher existance and no longer needs rep points to prove the size of his e-penis.Dante Hicks has ascended to a higher existance and no longer needs rep points to prove the size of his e-penis.Dante Hicks has ascended to a higher existance and no longer needs rep points to prove the size of his e-penis.Dante Hicks has ascended to a higher existance and no longer needs rep points to prove the size of his e-penis.
Re: is thinking about children sexually wrong?
Quote:
Originally Posted by mist
whyso?
Because it punishes people for looking at pictures. I don't think that should be classified as criminal activity. I'm sure there are exceptions, but in general the only use of force (i.e. the law) should be in response to a use of force by another individual. Looking at child porn does not involve the use of force.

Making child porn obviously should remain illegal and I'd be happy for the death penalty to be applied if I was sure of guilt.
Dante Hicks is offline   Reply With Quote