View Single Post
Unread 17 Apr 2011, 08:48   #3
Killeah
Old Skool
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Copenhagen, Denmark
Posts: 278
Killeah has a spectacular aura aboutKilleah has a spectacular aura about
Re: New Alliances for R42...

It´s apparently a delicate topic. But if we look at rnd 41, a tag limit of 50 would leave 8 alliances in direct competition, tag size wise. I´m well aware of the fact that 50 is still the counted score mark, however it would bring a clearer fight for the top 3 alliance spot. Alliances would have to do even more politics than now to steer through and win in the end.

Atm most focus is on CT and Ome them being "big tags", that could be spread out on the top 10 alliances (almost) with a 50 size tag.

The "active" community seems to span 700-800 accounts. One could argue that 80 is perhaps a tad too big, considering that 10% of the player base in one alliance limits the possibility of a widespread mix of alliances and politics in the game - (obviously very few are interested in doing anything but roiding 15 player tags).

The only real disadvandtage I see in limiting the tags is that you´re enforcing the fact that PA is too small, and still shrinking. So limiting would come out as a statement that PA is gone in 3 years.
Killeah is offline   Reply With Quote