Quote:
Originally Posted by Tietäjä
I think it was actually well planned and executed. I think this is what he's been ranting in my query about for a while, too bad I've mainly ignored him so far. Albeit, if Ascendancy had done it, Ascendancy wouldn't be here talking about who is the true winner of the round and who isn't.
Claiming someone else than the winner won is so round 20 kids.
|
Apart from Idler, I haven't seen any Ascendancy member here say Greenhills didn't
really win, so saying "Ascendancy" is claiming Greenhills' win was undeserved is prehaps grasping at straws a bit too desperately.
P.S.
In fact, it's perhaps interesting to note that myself and a few other people actually defended the legitity of his move, as opposed to joining the mob in demanding rule changes to prevent this "abuse".