Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Newt
I might be wrong, but most of the reasons people wanted to hit asc were due to legitimate concerns over planet and galaxy ranks as opposed to fretting over ascendancy being the #1 alliance. Which is fair enough I suppose, considering even I've seen hc of top alliances say things like "3:5 is unattackable :/"; they aren't saying that now.. or maybe they are :<
End of the day, you would have had 'high profile' people in 11:7, 6:3, no doubt the other top non-asc gals too, crying for their alliances to do something about 3:5 and the rest. Think its safe to say the people who are usually capable of pulling those strings prioritise: planet rank > galaxy rank > alliance rank. So not surprising that the enthusiasm/propoganda to take down urwins is quite small. At the moment.
Or maybe I have no clue at all and it was purely ND/CT attacking out of concern that asc would win the round  |
kudos on an intelligent reply. Your point does have some merit in it, to be fair. But it doesn't address the issue that people were
worried about Ascendancy being the #1 alliance and running away with the round, when there was clearly another alliance doing just that already. It seems at this point people chose the 'evil' they knew over the 'evil' they didn't.
But then what do I care? I'm scanning in InSomnia where we celebrate finding a defence fleet by crashing our fleets in harmonious joy.