Planetarion Forums - View Single Post

[B5]Londo · 7 Dec 2015, 11:59

This whole system seems to be designed to punish the already lower alliances and favour the already powerful. It is already obvious that top ranking tends to go to the best defenders, as butcher never tired of pointing out this round. And that is right enough, but why tilt the playing field further in their favour?

If you do intend to have loss incurred by land, then how is the lost xp allocated?
It has to be by planet rather than fleet since the base fleet does not currently count as a fleet (if hiding): a clean land shows on the combat reports part of the universe page as Attacking fleets 1 Defending fleets 0.

7 Dec 2015, 11:59	#17
[B5]Londo Paso Leaute Join Date: Mar 2008 Posts: 919	Re: Improvement in Score This whole system seems to be designed to punish the already lower alliances and favour the already powerful. It is already obvious that top ranking tends to go to the best defenders, as butcher never tired of pointing out this round. And that is right enough, but why tilt the playing field further in their favour? If you do intend to have loss incurred by land, then how is the lost xp allocated? It has to be by planet rather than fleet since the base fleet does not currently count as a fleet (if hiding): a clean land shows on the combat reports part of the universe page as Attacking fleets 1 Defending fleets 0. __________________ An optimist may see a light where there is none, but why must the pessimist always run to blow it out?