|
Re: Taking a long overdue piss on 1up's propaganda bonfire
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Zh|l
Funny that, for I don't recall seeing any targets reserved as N/A which would indicate such a thing.
|
So you have partaken in every galaxy raid 1up runs? I for 1 have seen raids with targets marked as N/A.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Hicks
Fork stop being a twat.
|
You are one to talk. :/.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Jackal2112
Right Fork, following your analogy this means that if a galaxy raid on a gal is not 100% covered it means theres a NAP between the attacking alliance and the alliance of the planet that is not being hit. How very LOGICAL!! Maybe you forgot that in almost every galaxy raid 1-2 planets are left untaken, for various reasons, either too small, no roids, tough fleet. So what if that one person happens to be LCH, or any other alliance ffs!
This is in no way proof of the fact theres a NAP between these 2 alliances!
|
True, there could be the possiblity of planets not being taken in a raid.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Jackal2112
PULLEEZZ - get a brain, before I dish out a list of your so-called NAP's between alliances, which would be solely based on the last 3 attacks on my gal in which certain planets were not hit.
|
PULLEEZZ - get a brain. You just totally contradicted yourself with everything you just said above this line.
__________________
<cheerios> waffle, the more you talk the more stupid you make yourself look
<[DC]waffle> liar cheerios
<[DC]waffle> who names themself after a breakfast food
<cheerios> just a heads up if you're drunk or summit
<[DC]waffle> fkin n00b
Last edited by waffle; 2 Jul 2004 at 08:57.
|