Quote:
|
Originally Posted by F0rk
<x> btw
<IRC LOGS>
x is not online atm so I am not going to say who he is. he will hopefully come forward and give his account
|
Right Fork, following your analogy this means that if a galaxy raid on a gal is not 100% covered it means theres a NAP between the attacking alliance and the alliance of the planet that is not being hit. How very LOGICAL!! Maybe you forgot that in almost every galaxy raid 1-2 planets are left untaken, for various reasons, either too small, no roids, tough fleet. So what if that one person happens to be LCH, or any other alliance ffs!
This is in no way proof of the fact theres a NAP between these 2 alliances!
PULLEEZZ - get a brain, before I dish out a list of your so-called NAP's between alliances, which would be solely based on the last 3 attacks on my gal in which certain planets were not hit.