Quote:
Originally Posted by ArcChas
if you agree a cooling off period for a NAP you stick to it - otherwise no one believes you the next time you ask for one.
|
Only CT still believes in things like cooldown periods, the rest of the allies have stopped caring about them rounds ago. As for the rest of the future, when FAnG wants to NAP CT again, CT will go into it again aslong as it is beneficial for CT i am sure.
imho, what CT has to learn is that a NAP will be ended (be it either by CT or the other party involved) when it stops serving it's purpose, and that NAPs need to be mutually beneficial.
CT should really get off their high horse, as when the high horse trips, the fall will be far worse.