|
Re: r67 who will win
Quote:
Originally Posted by booji
So far as I am aware there is no collusion between attackers and 3:4; they just make sure they are good enough targets that they get attacked and then def. Reinitiate after landing and repeat the cycle.
|
Sheer numbers suggest the amount of incomings they recieve is higher than 'normal' tho. So while you can't prove colluding between defender and attacker, there sure seem to be grounds to at least deem those planets that seem to initiate roids with no intent to properly defend them 'farms.' This would not be unprecedented either. In the case that butch3r cites involving crowke there definitely was no colluding between the attackers and the defender, but it was deemed that the act of initiating roids while having uncovered incs was enough to be closed over for crowke.
__________________
don't be an arse, join [TiT]
In the absence of the good old TiT alliance, look me up in VGN
Last edited by Influence; 14 Jun 2016 at 00:57.
|