Quote:
Originally Posted by Urgamanix
Butchers tabid fanatacism is reaching religious levels; no surprise that his ability to be logical and makes sense goes out the window at the same time.
The very few arguments youve made about lower tag limits are nonsensical; all the stuff about trolling is already happening in-game with these limits, and theres no evidence or logic to suggest it would get worse with smaller limits. In fact, as smaller limits lower the entry barrier to run a stable competitive alliance, the opposite would probably happen. Drone on.
|
As said before, with smaller tag limit it would be close to impossibole for a alliance to fetch off troll tags.
If BowS and say BF/CT/FL had 30-40 members each, bows couldve stopped any of those allies from winning alone basicly.
There is a illusion that there ever was gonna more than 4 alliances ever being in the race for #1 most rounds.
If you cant adapt to play with people who you dislike, you are doomed to fail.
if you dont have enough people to fill a 60 man tag, then you actualy have to go look for them.
If you cant controll 60 members, then put more time into the game.
If you cant work with people who is looking to run your alliance in a direction you dont agree with, either replace them with people who you agree with or learn to become a follower.
Guess what? The alliances like CT/BF/Ult is run by people who put a lot of time and energy into actualy running their alliance round after round. And these people often have disagrements over political moves, race strats, and many other subjects. But they are often teamplayers who know they wont always get their way, so they manage this.