Thread: Oh. My. God.
View Single Post
Unread 7 Aug 2007, 07:25   #25
Structural Integrity
Rawr rawr
 
Structural Integrity's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Upside down
Posts: 5,300
Structural Integrity needs a job and a girlfriendStructural Integrity needs a job and a girlfriendStructural Integrity needs a job and a girlfriendStructural Integrity needs a job and a girlfriendStructural Integrity needs a job and a girlfriendStructural Integrity needs a job and a girlfriendStructural Integrity needs a job and a girlfriendStructural Integrity needs a job and a girlfriendStructural Integrity needs a job and a girlfriendStructural Integrity needs a job and a girlfriendStructural Integrity needs a job and a girlfriend
Re: Oh. My. God.

Quote:
Originally Posted by djbass
things writing to the registry in general. Seeing as 99.99% of apps are relient on the registry to store settings its a bit ludicrous.
MS is clearly steering away from this "store settings in the registry" thing. It's simply a bad programming habit.
Most notable is the built in setting object in .NET applications created with Visual Studio. It allows you to add application and user settings with a few clicks. These settings are then stored in XML files with your app or in your documents and settings folder.
UAC is whining for a good reason, the problem though is the tonnes of legacy applications that still abuse the registry for storing settings.
__________________
"Yay"
Structural Integrity is offline   Reply With Quote