View Single Post
Unread 31 Dec 2006, 14:57   #16
KoeN
Lucky
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: -
Posts: 3,830
KoeN has a brilliant futureKoeN has a brilliant futureKoeN has a brilliant futureKoeN has a brilliant futureKoeN has a brilliant futureKoeN has a brilliant futureKoeN has a brilliant futureKoeN has a brilliant futureKoeN has a brilliant futureKoeN has a brilliant futureKoeN has a brilliant future
Re: Saddam, Hitler, Stalin, Hirohito... all were needed.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Malak
World War 1.
3.5 Generations (25 years) have past since The Great War.
37 million died, as a result (not counting deaths due to lack of medical supplies), let us assume that they would have bred, 37,000,000 multiplied by 3.5 = 129,500,000 people alive.

World War 2,
2.5 generations have past since World War 2.
63 million died.
63,000,000 multiplied by 2.5 = 157,500,000 people alive.

From both great wars there are 287,000,000 at the very least. but more likely 1,722,000,000 people.
so what you're trying to say is that 100 million less dead people would have given us a worldpopulation of 7,6 billion instead of 5,9 now.
(the worldpopulation in 1910 was about 1,8 billion, in 1940 it was 2,3).

i think your calculation is somewhat flawed, also because you're not taking into account how many extra lives were gained from war. in holland we had a babyboom after WW II for example; people have more sex during/after war. but you can also think of examples likes the nazi breedingprogram, the american soldiers in vietnam etc.

interesting topic though.
KoeN is offline   Reply With Quote