View Single Post
Unread 29 Jun 2005, 14:17   #5
MrPedantic
Banned
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 63
MrPedantic is a splendid one to beholdMrPedantic is a splendid one to beholdMrPedantic is a splendid one to beholdMrPedantic is a splendid one to beholdMrPedantic is a splendid one to beholdMrPedantic is a splendid one to beholdMrPedantic is a splendid one to behold
Re: Vote: Name the round competition for round XIV

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kargool
An empty throne seems suiting since eXilition isnt playing
It is for that very reason that an empty throne should not be in the short list

NO round name should EVER refer to an alliance, especially not one as undeserving as exilition
Hell not even Fury and Legion who are/were FAR FAR more deserving of that got one

One questions how all these little co-incidences have occurred.
  • Exilition found not guilty by multihunters, despite previous closures
  • Exilition winning the round
  • Exilition having their egos massaged far more in the end of round ceremony then other alliances have ever been
  • Exilition having a round essentially named after them

ONE QUESTIONS THE IMPARTIALITY OF THOSE IN PATEAM WHO HAVE DECIDED THIS SHORTLIST AND THE SANITY OF THOSE WHO THINK IT WOULD MAKE A GOOD ROUND NAME

Why not reveal who posted each of the names in the short list, let us see which pateam members they all are buddy-buddy with, hell even post the complete list of submissions to see if they truely were the more deserving choices.

Should an empty throne win, then the next round in my eyes will be little more then a farce, an echo of a game bereft of competant and impartial leaders

What have they to hide?
MrPedantic is offline   Reply With Quote