Quote:
Originally Posted by Kaiba
Whether you go for 1st or just to stop ult winning these alliances go 150% on that goal and will happily screw over potential friends for an extra night of attacks or to get another 20 avg roids ahead not thinking what will happen when the tide turns. They end up angry at each other because for example 'p3n decided to gal raid hr on a Wednesday' instead of sticking hitting no roid ults which causes them to not help each other when needed and for the little tags who got farned alongside attacking ult to work against them when they could do with focusing on ult
|
Did you not read what I said - no-one expected or intended to stop ult winning, it was just about damage limitation.
And anyway, surely the ideas that 'alliances go 150% on that goal' and 'They end up angry at each other because for example "p3n decided to gal raid hr on a Wednesday" instead of sticking hitting no roid ults' are in contradiction - that the latter
was an issue shows that the former didnt exist.
All the alliances involved took breaks from hitting Ult - the conflict over that was whether those breaks were properly co-ordinated and agreed with the other ult hostile alliances, not because alliances were so zealous about getting at ult, but because everyone knew the others were not zealous and might actually be dropping out completely and leaving them alone to take the heat. If any alliances were genuinely so zealously anti-ult that they would fight regardless this might have been less of an issue.