Quote:
Originally Posted by [B5]Londo
Wtf - if (by some miracle) those four were all 80 then they would be fighting each other not bitch slapping p3n.
You seem to miss the glaring problem with a tag size of 80; or indeed the whole tag size argument regardless of level. This round shows all to clearly that allies do not recruit to the tag limit automatically. They only do that if they are serious about winning - you cannot change the tag limit to change peoples attitude.
Even if they do have 60 they can still avoid going ftw - as app is showing by their current lazy approach resulting in crashing right left and centre. Ive had one crash on me, and two crash defending against me in in two days.
|
Isnt "bitch slapping" what happened to FAnG the other day for trying to "fence it to planet wins"?
Im pretty sure that was the exact reason one of the p3ng HCs gave for FAnG being ganged exactly that day.
If Apprime/CT/ND had more numbers on their side, it would be much easier for them to deal with annoying smaller Ult(or anyone else leading by a big margine) NAPers on their own, instead of having to relay on taking 500 ticks NAP with Ult.
Its much harder for a tag like Apprime/ND(using this round as an example) to compete for #1 when they have 30-40 mans tag like Norse/Faceless ptargetting/trying to fck em over, because the margins simply too low atm.
A 40 man active tag can easily compete with a 60 man slightly less active tag in a 1 v 1 mud fight, there is no security in numbers anymore, wich was one of the initial goals for alliance in the past.