Quote:
|
Originally Posted by zebra
Who exactly has been saying this...? Sun_Tzu started the thread as a discussion of 'Interpretting the EULA' and has been using Denial's bot as a real world example. Mz explicitly said a Denial botnet was possible but he had zero proof whatsoever and his point was purely theoretical (in bold too, but communication skills don't seem to be the strong point in past and present Denial members). Phil^ was mostly talking about tech stuff or the specifics of the closures (from when 3 Denial HC cheated, if you'll recall). Going for false sympathy ftl.
|
Sure, it may all be theoretical and they may just simply be uses as a real life example...
However there was absolutly no need to drag Denial into this. They could have simply said "alliance x" or not mention them at all.
To me, being an outside spectator, they just mention Denial just to put even more people on the anti-denial bandwagon making a post that has **** all to do with denial but accidently "mentioning" them even though they have no proof at all that Denial has a system like that in place or has used a system like that in the past.
If they would have had even the slightest bit of proof that Denial did use something like that I wouldn't mind but as it stands now they're just using the Denial name to fit into their (and probably yours too) propaganda
False cheating accusations FTL! (caus that's what this basicly is, even if it's only meant to be "theoretical" and a "real life example")