View Single Post
Unread 30 Jan 2007, 18:20   #55
jerome
.
 
jerome's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 3,382
jerome contributes so much and asks for so littlejerome contributes so much and asks for so littlejerome contributes so much and asks for so littlejerome contributes so much and asks for so littlejerome contributes so much and asks for so littlejerome contributes so much and asks for so littlejerome contributes so much and asks for so littlejerome contributes so much and asks for so littlejerome contributes so much and asks for so littlejerome contributes so much and asks for so littlejerome contributes so much and asks for so little
Re: Ticks stop - rollback etc

Quote:
Originally Posted by notsure
From what I remember -- everyone complained last round because PA weren't following the "suggested" guidelines and were doing things differently with every downtime -- they went away and wrote a set of proceedures, which now they're following everyone is complaining about again.

No matter what PATeam do, there are going to be some people who will benefit, and some who will be disadvantaged -- at least if they're following proceedures, they will be consistent *every* time and people will know what to expect.
consistent rule for EVERY situation is NOT A GOOD THING. subjectivity must be kept at hand to allow for fair dealings. the only possible consistent rule i can see being 'okay' is the time delay if the game is down for over 2-3 ticks - but DEFINITELY never a GUARANTEED full recall, that's just silly
jerome is offline   Reply With Quote