Planetarion Forums - View Single Post

JonnyBGood · 14 Jun 2009, 15:23

Having thought about it for a while I made a stats set for next round.

http://spreadsheets.google.com/pub?k...Sg&output=html

Emp efficiencies aren't added but I'd go generally easy to emp xan, harder to emp terran.

Basically 2 pods per race, 3 was getting messy, down to 6 ships per race and classic formulae in general. Every race has something cool going for it which would make me want to play it, and has proven popular, ter de army, xan having both fi and co, zik ships having huge efficiencies, cath co fleet and I still have no real idea why anyone would want to play etd.

Efficiencies are just a rough guideline. I'm quite willing to nerf xan's efficiencies to shit and back again (preferably by nerfing armour, not damage) if there is a perception that they're overpowered and so on.

14 Jun 2009, 15:23	#44
JonnyBGood Banned Join Date: May 2001 Location: Further to the right Posts: 19,441	Re: R32 Shipstats Having thought about it for a while I made a stats set for next round. http://spreadsheets.google.com/pub?k...Sg&output=html Emp efficiencies aren't added but I'd go generally easy to emp xan, harder to emp terran. Basically 2 pods per race, 3 was getting messy, down to 6 ships per race and classic formulae in general. Every race has something cool going for it which would make me want to play it, and has proven popular, ter de army, xan having both fi and co, zik ships having huge efficiencies, cath co fleet and I still have no real idea why anyone would want to play etd. Efficiencies are just a rough guideline. I'm quite willing to nerf xan's efficiencies to shit and back again (preferably by nerfing armour, not damage) if there is a perception that they're overpowered and so on. __________________ Some might ask what good is life without purpose but I'm anticipating a good lunch.