Planetarion Forums - View Single Post

HaNzI · 14 May 2010, 22:55

Im all for 50man tags, not removing alliance tags. Lets be honest, Ascendancy won round 30 by recruiting every man and its dog. 120+ players in the end. Not many alliances can have 100 players and be effiecient, so why give them the option to mass recruit.

Personally i think its far better for the community as a whole if each player in a group is treated as an individual, not as a planet in the mass. This gets hard once you go over 50 people who should all be fighting for the same goal. The argument about denying nubs the chance to learn the game, by making the alliance limit lower, is bullshit. Atleast in apprime the alliance limits never stopped us from taking in less experienced players and teach them our way to play. something that will also be done for the coming round.

14 May 2010, 22:55	#36
HaNzI Apprime Troll HC Join Date: Mar 2008 Posts: 857	Re: Alliance player limit Im all for 50man tags, not removing alliance tags. Lets be honest, Ascendancy won round 30 by recruiting every man and its dog. 120+ players in the end. Not many alliances can have 100 players and be effiecient, so why give them the option to mass recruit. Personally i think its far better for the community as a whole if each player in a group is treated as an individual, not as a planet in the mass. This gets hard once you go over 50 people who should all be fighting for the same goal. The argument about denying nubs the chance to learn the game, by making the alliance limit lower, is bullshit. Atleast in apprime the alliance limits never stopped us from taking in less experienced players and teach them our way to play. something that will also be done for the coming round.