View Single Post
Unread 20 Oct 2013, 16:19   #15
Plaguuu
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 477
Plaguuu is just really nicePlaguuu is just really nicePlaguuu is just really nicePlaguuu is just really nicePlaguuu is just really nice
Re: R54 stat discussion: revised Round 52 stats

Why is xan fi attack on xan bad? Attacker fire first def dies. Its not about taking a chance you assume its real and kill it anyway.


Quote:
Originally Posted by Paisley View Post
My suggestions would make the attacks more offensive, although there isn't any 0 loss def, as pat's stats remain there are ally def ships that are a 1 fleet stoppers (assuming it isn't a xp crashing landing)
As most folk tend to like landing for roids with a 0 shiploss landing (not counting ship steals etc.)

Xan Fi attack on Xan fi defense is a bad idea
I remember alot of xan crashers in r34 just taking the chance for a land.
( http://beta.planetarion.com/history/...?id=4&round=34 )

The Emp resistances/gun or emp effiencies haven't been done yet.
I presume the spider will fire before the beetle will remain.

I have also taking into consideration of faking attacks like faking xan fi as de etc.

My suggestions have also presuming that there will be a change to the gal set up as there are a good few 1 fleet stoppers that are a higher class.
For example Ingal ETD Rangers (frig class anti fi) v a Xan fi fleet
Plaguuu is offline   Reply With Quote