Thread: Fort Gals
View Single Post
Unread 30 Dec 2009, 02:41   #9
DarkHeart
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 383
DarkHeart is just really niceDarkHeart is just really niceDarkHeart is just really niceDarkHeart is just really niceDarkHeart is just really nice
Re: Fort Gals

if you aren't the best, if you aren't as organised or lack the initiative or motivation to win, then why should the game be changed to accomodate your failures? It's well known on here that I don't get on well with Asc, but kudos to them, if you complain about them you simply aren't as good as them

Fortress gals are a wicked addition to the game, instead of the game being adapted to remove them, the game should be developed to encourage alliances to come up with some way of competing. That doesnt mean granting them an unfair advantage by nerfing the top alliances, it means developing and encoruaging existing players, and structuring a development process for new and emerging players.

Put it this way Abort. Fortress gals can easily be nerfed by the creators (as apparently is scheduled to happen?), but its a short term fix and the players that are better than you will jsut develop a new strategy to dominate you. If you are continually recalling attacks, then ask yourself the question, is your alliances offensive strategy adequate? Get thinking like them, the game will only carry you so far before you have those nose bleeds
DarkHeart is offline   Reply With Quote