[Tietäjä]

(to be precise, the reason why steve keen attracts followers in certain dogma is not because his work would have much in the sense of logical arguments, but because his conclusions appeal to the followers and he happens to hold some degree in some university somewhere. the idea is of course never to discuss or critisize how he exactly he argues his position, because this is not purposeful. it won't hold any closer inspection, but it's not supposed to, and the followers are just happy to agree on the conclusion and dogmatically repeat it. no one on "his side of the camp" will openly challenge him on say, fundamental logical problems, because that would be the equivalent to offending the high priest).