Quote:
Originally Posted by HeimdallR
its alright, i understand, your just not getting it, or are not willing to see it from our point of view.
continuing this discussion is pointless.
|
Is it not equally pointless if you assume you're correct, regardless of evidence to the contrary?
As I stated, if second tier alliances truly had no leadership deficit compared to top alliances, they would be able to poach members from top alliances just as well as the other way around. It's rather pointless to argue against this, as each time a new top tier alliance is formed, such as Apprime most recently, it poaches members straight from the top tier alliances. It is possible, it's simply a matter of very few people being able to do so, very few people inspire people to follow them in such a way, and can then follow this up with the necessary strengths in leadership to retain these players.
The problem isn't new, and the argument that there isn't enough leaders to support more top level alliances has been around for at least half the decade.