Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Spiderman
|
To keep things simple I'd suggest those who questioned my previous response should read that entry. It gives a fair overview of the procedings of the trial and isn't just some media blowover.
Those that are saying she's guilty are doing so without knowing all the facts, nothing of what has been presented suggests in any way there is solid evidence that she is guilty other than possesion of drugs, and nothing to say she had prior knowledge of them. There is only her word against that of the customs officer (who I think is just trying to cover his arse).