What I don't understand, Troll, is that
in this thread you voice your concern for alliances that don't defend, because they can't manage to make communities without doing so. And in this thread, you voice an opinion that would almotst certainly force a number of alliances to cut their membersize drastically. I think it should be obvious that this would lead to alliances disbanding, and a lot of communities to disappear.
Another thing is that the rounds where it has been easy to set up smaller alliances have also been rounds where attacking has been a lot more important than defending. This round, and round 16, attacking has been so much more important than defending, it's almost ridicolous to compare them to other rounds.
Personally, I don't disagree that much. In my opinion we should either enforce small alliances, or not enforce limits at all.