View Single Post
Unread 14 Dec 2006, 13:41   #41
Phil^
Insomniac
 
Phil^'s Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 3,583
Phil^ spreads love and joy to the forum in the same way Jesus wouldPhil^ spreads love and joy to the forum in the same way Jesus wouldPhil^ spreads love and joy to the forum in the same way Jesus wouldPhil^ spreads love and joy to the forum in the same way Jesus wouldPhil^ spreads love and joy to the forum in the same way Jesus wouldPhil^ spreads love and joy to the forum in the same way Jesus wouldPhil^ spreads love and joy to the forum in the same way Jesus wouldPhil^ spreads love and joy to the forum in the same way Jesus wouldPhil^ spreads love and joy to the forum in the same way Jesus wouldPhil^ spreads love and joy to the forum in the same way Jesus wouldPhil^ spreads love and joy to the forum in the same way Jesus would
Re: Round 20 Changes

Quote:
Originally Posted by aNgRyDuCk
as I agree with your take on why it would reflect an alliances direct strenght, the point is, it means 2-3 alliances, top 5 maybe will compete, the rest are just farting in the wind, and it will decide the outcome of the round on the alliance level far too early.
the rest are farting in the wind usually anyway the way things are. They are never a real contender for the win even with the previous system and this change in how alliances are ranked will not change that.
They have always, and seemingly will always be collaborators, never in with a direct title shot but left to fiddle behind the scenes to help another alliance win.
If the other alliances want to win they need to overhaul their command, their members and their playing style
__________________
Phil^
Phil^ is offline   Reply With Quote