Thread: r61 Changes?
View Single Post
Unread 10 Mar 2015, 11:42   #20
[B5]Londo
Paso Leaute
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 919
[B5]Londo has much to be proud of[B5]Londo has much to be proud of[B5]Londo has much to be proud of[B5]Londo has much to be proud of[B5]Londo has much to be proud of[B5]Londo has much to be proud of[B5]Londo has much to be proud of[B5]Londo has much to be proud of[B5]Londo has much to be proud of
Re: r61 Changes?

Quote:
Originally Posted by BloodyButcher View Post
Aint you apart of the gang that is creating a new tag this round?
It will be interesting hearing you experinced playing in a smaller tag pos round.
I dont think he is.
In any event arguably the experience of playing in a smaller tag when there are 60 man tags out there is not going be directly comparable to playing in a universe of all smaller tags.
Indeed, arguably having Rogues as a smaller tag makes the problem which Krypton wanted smaller tags to tackle even worse. The whole point of smaller tags was to create a level playing field between many alliances and thereby make politics more open.
Creating a new small tag like Rogues takes a few players from other tags meaning fewer are on 60 and thus even notionally in contention (and that is before removing those that count themselves out for reasons of their own). At best creating Rogues has removed just p3n leaving 4 potential tags on near 60: Ult, BF, CT and ND. ND can presumably be counted out already so thats 3.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Appocomaster View Post
yes, and then the #10 -> #11th galaxy could use their late starter. Every galaxy gets one, it's just that you can only use it when out of the top 10.
Yeah thats good so its not really a cliff edge as I feared, and probably only counts out the very top from using lates should they wish.
__________________
An optimist may see a light where there is none, but why must the pessimist always run to blow it out?

Last edited by [B5]Londo; 10 Mar 2015 at 11:48.
[B5]Londo is offline   Reply With Quote