View Single Post
Unread 14 Jun 2009, 12:45   #18
Fuzzy
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 216
Fuzzy is a splendid one to beholdFuzzy is a splendid one to beholdFuzzy is a splendid one to beholdFuzzy is a splendid one to beholdFuzzy is a splendid one to beholdFuzzy is a splendid one to beholdFuzzy is a splendid one to beholdFuzzy is a splendid one to behold
Re: Round 31: Final Analysis

Quote:
Originally Posted by Inforza View Post
Heh Ave, it was clear in bp preround that the gal would be xvx/asc .. how could we have known preround how politics where gonna end up like..
well when your GC who decided to make a mixed gal with the only alliances with full tag is also the HC of one of those alliances and a core member for the other in many previous rounds you can ask questions as to how much was known pre-round about politics...

(im not saying this is my opinion, just that it's an interesting observation)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Inforza
also why every1 saying we where fencing when they didnt target us.. its not that we could do anything about the fact we never received incs.. its the other alliances that have to hit us
similar point to above. the only alliances who were going to actively target you were the BG's or asc. your GC arranged a nap with asc preventing them from hitting your gal, and allowing asc to hit the BG's full force which was going to result in them getting dominated or going inactive - in which case they werent going to be a threat to your gal.
__________________
Nox, CT, Aud, Omen, S3XYTIME, WAFHH, Apprime, Ascendancy
#1 gal r29 - 1:10 ftw \o/
son of BENNEH, brother of bread| (former son of eksero )

"You cant say an alliance lost, when they finished 2nd" - Light, 2009
Fuzzy is offline   Reply With Quote