Re: Round 31: Final Analysis
Quote:
Originally Posted by Inforza
Heh Ave, it was clear in bp preround that the gal would be xvx/asc .. how could we have known preround how politics where gonna end up like..
|
well when your GC who decided to make a mixed gal with the only alliances with full tag is also the HC of one of those alliances and a core member for the other in many previous rounds you can ask questions as to how much was known pre-round about politics...
(im not saying this is my opinion, just that it's an interesting observation)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Inforza
also why every1 saying we where fencing when they didnt target us.. its not that we could do anything about the fact we never received incs.. its the other alliances that have to hit us
|
similar point to above. the only alliances who were going to actively target you were the BG's or asc. your GC arranged a nap with asc preventing them from hitting your gal, and allowing asc to hit the BG's full force which was going to result in them getting dominated or going inactive - in which case they werent going to be a threat to your gal.
__________________
Nox, CT, Aud, Omen, S3XYTIME, WAFHH, Apprime, Ascendancy
#1 gal r29 - 1:10 ftw \o/
son of BENNEH, brother of bread| (former son of eksero )
"You cant say an alliance lost, when they finished 2nd" - Light, 2009
|