Quote:
Originally Posted by Sandvold
And before booji and/or munkee respond that it was gal raiding not ptarget. Okey sure, you napped everyone except HR, astatores and norse, so you could only hit a few planets in gal raids.
However in my mind if i nap everyone except one alliance in the uni, i wouldn't call it gal raiding, and say i could only hit the planets of that alliance.
|
If you are talking about the initial dispute then I will restate that almost no alliance would consider 5 of 16 targets to be ptargeting. That is normal raiding not ptargeting. I accept it is not quite gal raiding as it was a slightly odd selection of targets due to the number of naps. There were also 5 HR targets in that raid, we did not get them wailing about ptargeting.
The next day most certainly was - only 1 target was not norse and that was due to that person having left your ally recently but since I confirmed with you first that you considered us at war you knew it was coming.
This is something norse does every round, takes a relatively small raid and blows it out of proportion thus creating war between us. Yes it is partially our fault that we dont back down but you are immediately ultra aggressive about any hitting of your people even if not actually very concentrated. Perhaps this method of diplomacy encourages others to back off, as you well know it never has with p3n, and probably never will given that I am the 'dove' in the alliance and your methods manage to annoy me far more than BB or carDi.
And as Londo has said my post had nothing to do with norse. I care little about norse, I dont consider you to have been a problem this round or much of a factor in our strategic thinking. Having you hitting us has made very little difference, we dropped roids a little faster but we all know that dropping roids fast is what p3n does best. Since then your attacks have almost never got through so I thank you for the def points.