Planetarion Forums - View Single Post - Round 30

booji · 9 Jan 2009, 20:00

I dont see why, while 5th is a good position for a 'dead or doomed' alliance it is a bad position for an alliance that was looking for top 3.

and as you know I was disappointed in audentes for many reasons that were unrelated to rank, particularly lack of planning for the war, lack of teamwork, feeling dictated to by HCs and lack of defence, even if we had made T3 I would probably have had 'disappointed in Audentes' in my sig.

9 Jan 2009, 20:00	#283
booji a bucket Join Date: Jul 2003 Location: Chatham, UK Posts: 1,073	Re: Round 30 - Gamethread I dont see why, while 5th is a good position for a 'dead or doomed' alliance it is a bad position for an alliance that was looking for top 3. and as you know I was disappointed in audentes for many reasons that were unrelated to rank, particularly lack of planning for the war, lack of teamwork, feeling dictated to by HCs and lack of defence, even if we had made T3 I would probably have had 'disappointed in Audentes' in my sig. __________________ Proud to have been TGV! aargh! died in Jenova! \| idled in ROCK \| disappointed in Audentes \| been Roguish \| p-p-previously a p-p-p3nguin Ascendancy Otterly an Otter.