Quote:
Originally Posted by [B5]Londo
The attempt to suggest that had we gone on we would have won is clearly given the lie by the fact that P3n has fallen to 3rd and stayed there.
P3n had lost no.1 before the NAP commenced because it had lost 15% two days straight. What was bows doing while p3n collapsed? - it should be blindingly obvious even from the outside that p3n would be unable to sustain a war with ult while also being hit by FAnG, Norse, Kittenz and occasionally your bows.
|
http://kia.cthq.net/?p=compare&compa...=168&show=size
Yeah sure, p3nguins was having a hard time. Guess thats the reason for you guys wanting to take this NAP, to make sure the other none-Ult tags stopped outgrowing you.
Was the round over? No, ND/Apprime still had a roid lead on Ult, and P3nguins/CT wasnt that far behind.
Maybe the CT/ND/p3ng HC belived that Apprime/Norse/BowS had all taken NAPs with Ultores, and left CT/ND/p3ng to deal with the Ultores incs themself, or maybe they wanted to beat Apprime/BowS/Norse to NAPing Ultores, i dont know.
What is for sure that the round was certainly over once another 3 major alliances decided to NAP Ult.
Quote:
Originally Posted by [B5]Londo
Yes I rejoined the game for one round only because I was told we wouldnt be a contender and it would be relaxing. What gives you the right to pontificate about contenders. Bows has rarely, if ever, made a try at it.
|
Yeah, but as ive said in the past the small tag sizes makes it far too easy for mid sized alliance to aim for being a mid size alliance, and fence it to planetranks/galranks/whatever.
If the tag sizes was larger this round, maybe the gap wouldve been big enough for p3ngs to be roided/slapped around by ND/CT/BowS/App(if those 3 were all 80 members).