Re: Santa Stats
Imo BS is a support strat atm. No ally would go BS as main strat but CATHS can be enough good as a complement for other strats. Example: XAN CR(main) + CATH BS(support). If that was the aim of it then it is fine the way it is.
But ETD BS seems irrelevant. I thought of three suggestions:
- If Starwart had DE as T1 and FR was Tycoon's T2 the CATH+ETD BS would still have the flaw of being mostly EMP based, but would be more ofensive.
- Making DE as T1 in Tycoon and in Recluse would help. But BW would be more useless. And it is considerably useless atm with its current D/C in comparison with Cerberus, Scorpion, Saint and Clipper effs.
- Making Tycoon INIT 5 firing before all DEs (Clipper exception) and before all CRs (Spectre exception).
===============
About CATH/ZIK DE, I think the match against FI is fine. Imo only a few strats will allow an ally to base its anti-DE defense on FI. So maybe running a few calcs combining FI and CO on def is enough to judge if ZIK/CATH DE is playable.
__________________
mxy
|