Quote:
|
Originally Posted by GJN
Rubbish. True, it was not supporting Asc in terms of score accumulation.
|
Heh. I should've just left it at this, you said enough yourself.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by GJN
Desc did however, covert op many alliance's amps. As such, Asc was the only tag that gained from Desc activity.
|
Surely this is wrong. When a scanner is crippled by having his amps destroyed, every alliance other than his own benefits from his inability to scan distorter-heavy planets. So every distorter-heavy planet in the universe gained from Desc's initial covert ops. If it even had any significant effect on the round, which it didn't really.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by GJN
Desc worked in Asc's favour, which in light of your admission that Desc was created to get around the alliance tag limit
|
What admission? Dude, the same thing was being said in this (and all related) threads since the very beginning, and as far as I could understand, it was told to the MH beforehand as well.
The group has extra people, and they made a new tag to play in. There was no actual supporting, as you said yourself in the very first line.
The entire fuss about covert ops and scanning is ridiculous and doesn't deserve a serious discussion. It's pretty much that some people felt a desperate need to find
something so they could have the satisfaction of screaming "cheaters", "game killers", and the like.
As you can see, it's a very small group of people that cares, and even smaller one that attempts to make Descendancy look like some grand cheating scheme. But it's good comedy, at least.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by wakey
And unlike past forum troll squads the problem with Asc's is it isn't restricted to the forums, their goal to annoy every member of this community happens in every facet of the game.
|
That makes perfect sense, yes.