Quote:
|
Originally Posted by furball
The standard line is, and has always been, that moderators' posting should be treated the same as any other poster's. Given that insulting someone isn't unacceptable behaviour (depending on the context), then I see no reason why JBG should be censored for doing so.
|
from the rules you mods have to uphold : ( clause 4 )
Quote:
to actually attack their person is wrong. Being verbally
attacked by people in groups is unfair and is not, in my opinion, at all allowable. Its childish and immature and will be stopped.
|
So far i see a large group attacking red- ( although its painfully obvious why, both to read the cause and resulting posts ) and mods actively participating in it.
No sign of stopping it thusfar. Its like a pack of cats playing with a mouse for their own amusement.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by furball
Don't expect us to treat posters any differently than how we would if we were regular forum members. You'll generally find that mods are of a calibre where they initally argue the point, until they too are faced with someone's idiocy and see little point in putting the effort into countering capricious arguments.
|
Why?
Why shouldnt mods be held to a higher standard then regular posters?
Its a position of responsibility after all
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by furball
As Jester said (he was AD mod at the time), they tried and there was a blanket refusal.
|
Im only half remembering the attempt. Regardless though, if JBG was in pateam for a period of time then he will have probably had to sign one.