agree with most of what jerome wrote. It's sad that so many people nap the enemies, especially if they do it while war is still going on.
It's not a secret 7:5 were protected by exi and various planets had naps/deals with other alliances but unfortunately it turns out many of the other top gals (and planets) had same "advantages" for most part of the round so when 7:5 still won after massive incs for a while in the end they deserved the victory more then the other gals on top.
Shipjumpers and selfish planets can ruin much of the fun in this game for those of us who like playing fair and I have no idea why top alliances still let shipjumpers join them in middle of a round and complain when they loose a lot of members later rounds when things arent going that well. Ideally everyone should be "forced" to stay in same alliance as they started in and those that decide to leave or get kicked out for being illoyal/selfish should not be let in to other top alliances that round (some kind of gentlemen's agreement between all big alliances).
Only fun with this round were organising attacks and getting through with both fake and real waves on many of the guys in 7:5 in the end
The attacks put them back around 10-15 mill score and 15 k roids (assuming they would have continued to grow at same speed if we hadnt organised the attacks on them).
If 1:6 hadn't messed things up and lost a lot of roids and value in the end they actually would have won this round.
Realised early this round exi would win but never gave up and kept attacking top planets so ended #1 in XPscore even though I were zik and had big fleet most of the round (hard to keep up in value in end when enemy planets got 5-10 times more roids and gal/allie have no chance whatsoever of covering incs from exi). Really don't understand why many peeps are so afraid of attacking top planets.. They get defence most of the time but the few times you get through you can gain a lot.