Thread: A Suggestion
View Single Post
Unread 23 Jul 2013, 00:57   #12
BloodyButcher
Propaganda Chief
 
BloodyButcher's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Under the Rainbow
Posts: 4,740
BloodyButcher has much to be proud ofBloodyButcher has much to be proud ofBloodyButcher has much to be proud ofBloodyButcher has much to be proud ofBloodyButcher has much to be proud ofBloodyButcher has much to be proud ofBloodyButcher has much to be proud ofBloodyButcher has much to be proud ofBloodyButcher has much to be proud of
Re: A Suggestion

Quote:
Originally Posted by Urgamanix View Post
Your suggestions about formal war bonuses are good and add to the game. However, the one problem with your suggestions are that you are putting the bonuses too much in the hands of the alliance as it were. You can decide who to war and who to get the bonus off, which may strengthen blocks and smaller-ally farming.

For my suggestion, the aim is to take the bonus out of the hands of the alliance. So saying, youll ONLY get your bonus if u hit THIS ally that is of similar size and count to you (with a good rationale of tension, like US vs USSR superpowers). This will shake up blocks and politics a lot more than if you simply swap from fighting A to B, in which case youd still get your bonus.

There's carrots and there are sticks. If you put control of the carrot in the hands of the people you're trying to tempt, it isn't really effective anymore
It is no such things at small alliances today.
Atleast this would give the fencers some more trouble.
__________________
RainbowS

RB Ely MISTU Angel Fusi0n 1up ToF VisioN CT FAnG ROCK
BloodyButcher is offline   Reply With Quote