View Single Post
Unread 16 Jul 2004, 23:30   #42
Nondescript Human
nondescript human
 
Nondescript Human's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Posts: 1,079
Nondescript Human has a brilliant futureNondescript Human has a brilliant futureNondescript Human has a brilliant futureNondescript Human has a brilliant futureNondescript Human has a brilliant futureNondescript Human has a brilliant futureNondescript Human has a brilliant futureNondescript Human has a brilliant futureNondescript Human has a brilliant futureNondescript Human has a brilliant futureNondescript Human has a brilliant future
Re: BNP program on beeb one

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tactitus
The Nazi party received 37% of the vote in the July 1932 elections and as they were the largest single party, it was entirely reasonable that they get the Chancellorship in a coalition government. Hindenburg refused to give Hitler the Chancellorship and so the Nazis refused to join a ruling coalition. The other parties could not hold a coalition together, and so elections were held again in November. In the November elections, the Nazis only got 33% percent of the vote, but they were still the larges single party and Hindenberg finally offered Hitler the Chancellorship.
Yes, the Nazis won the most votes (and therefore under the Weimar system the most seats) but 33% of votes wouldn't necessarily be enough to make the BNP the largest party in the Commons, even if no other party gained more votes. My point was that while 33% of votes was enough to gain power in 1933 Weimar, it wouldn't be in today's UK. Also, as I said, there are several other things which completely invalidate Androme's comparision of Weimar and the UK.
Nondescript Human is offline   Reply With Quote