Quote:
Originally posted by Dante Hicks
You said 'they' take more than they give. Even if immigrants (not that you can consider them as a group but nevermind) received 20% more welfare payments (on average) than natives, how would that prove they receive more than they give? I'm not even sure how you'd work out such a thing, which is why I asked.
There have been studies done (I'm unsure of their methodology) and they tended to show it was a net benefit to the receiving country. Another study said first-generation immigrants are $30k drain on the US, but second generation immigrants give a $80k surplus. Or something like that.
|
while on your average 'autochtonous citizen' you make money, since otherwise you can't lose it at 'them takers'
easy as pie.
If 'they' take, we 'must' give, since it is a balance and stuff.