Quote:
Originally posted by Knight Theamion
given in the 'overrepresented in crime statistics and various forms of statesupport'
|
You said 'they' take more than they give. Even if immigrants (not that you can consider them as a group but nevermind) received 20% more welfare payments (on average) than natives, how would that prove they receive more than they give? I'm not even sure how you'd work out such a thing, which is why I asked.
There have been studies done (I'm unsure of their methodology) and they tended to show it was a net benefit to the receiving country. Another study said first-generation immigrants are $30k drain on the US, but second generation immigrants give a $80k surplus. Or something like that.