View Single Post
Unread 8 Jan 2005, 20:24   #170
queball
Ball
 
queball's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 4,410
queball contributes so much and asks for so littlequeball contributes so much and asks for so littlequeball contributes so much and asks for so littlequeball contributes so much and asks for so littlequeball contributes so much and asks for so littlequeball contributes so much and asks for so littlequeball contributes so much and asks for so littlequeball contributes so much and asks for so littlequeball contributes so much and asks for so littlequeball contributes so much and asks for so littlequeball contributes so much and asks for so little
Re: [Controversial Discussion] GOD

Quote:
Originally Posted by Boogster
I completely disagree.

Evolution has not been proved. Neither has God.

I could give accounts of things that cannot be explained by science, and that seem to be evidence of a God. Why is this any less evidence than scientific hypothesise, especially considering the supernatural nature of the enquiry?
"God of the Gaps"
*googles*
http://members.aol.com/steamdoc/writings/gaps.html
queball is offline   Reply With Quote