View Single Post
Unread 12 Mar 2008, 13:03   #50
Banned
Banned
 
Banned's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: ******
Posts: 2,326
Banned contributes so much and asks for so littleBanned contributes so much and asks for so littleBanned contributes so much and asks for so littleBanned contributes so much and asks for so littleBanned contributes so much and asks for so littleBanned contributes so much and asks for so littleBanned contributes so much and asks for so littleBanned contributes so much and asks for so littleBanned contributes so much and asks for so littleBanned contributes so much and asks for so littleBanned contributes so much and asks for so little
Re: Fake nicking: good or bad?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Turtle
Fake nicking is useful for one thing, hiding your nick. With the small size of the universe now its pretty much guaranteed that your alliance is going to be known if you actively attack and defend with your alliance.

Its still useful for hiding your nick however if you're concerned that you will be targeted for who you are. People hold grudges, and there are people with powerful positions in various alliances who have no qualms against using their power to carry out personal vendettas. This is particularly true for BGs, and there are certain individuals whom I would highly recommend fake nicking if I was BPing with them, whereas I personally wouldn't bother.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Banned
Anyone who is scared that their nick will somehow attract more incoming is vastly overestimating their own importance. Elviz is a woeful fakenicker, generally draws incoming on his nick and has still won 3 rounds.

Most people have BPs with multiple alliances in them, so lose their nicks to other alliances before the shuffle.

In other words, anyone who think they're getting an advantage out of fakenicking is stupid.
Banned is offline   Reply With Quote