View Single Post
Unread 10 Mar 2008, 09:30   #74
Veedeejem!
Hibernating
 
Veedeejem!'s Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Team Kesha
Posts: 1,621
Veedeejem! has a reputation beyond reputeVeedeejem! has a reputation beyond reputeVeedeejem! has a reputation beyond reputeVeedeejem! has a reputation beyond reputeVeedeejem! has a reputation beyond reputeVeedeejem! has a reputation beyond reputeVeedeejem! has a reputation beyond reputeVeedeejem! has a reputation beyond reputeVeedeejem! has a reputation beyond reputeVeedeejem! has a reputation beyond reputeVeedeejem! has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Remove the scan tech tree

Quote:
Originally Posted by Gate
Some input from PAteam would definitely be appreciated.

The only real pitfall I currently see is Sun Tzu's comment on AUs. Xands would be given a greater advantage...

Possible solutions for this need to be worked out. Allowing cloaked stuff to apper in unit scans but maintaining its other advantages, or just ignoring the issue are possible solutions.

SUGGESTED NEW TREE:
Defence Detection - A jgp that can only be done at eta4 or less and only displays defending ships on your eta
Unit Scan - same as current AU, displays cloaked ships

Available from tick start.

Planet, Surface, Tech, News, Jgp, Incoming researchable. Letters used: D U P S T N J I

Amps and Dists remain as-are. Quest to build security centre replaced with quest to build an Amplifier.
If you're going to take away xan's cloaking advantage you might aswell just give them extra armor and call them terran 2...

Xan is supposed to sacrifice armor for initiative and cloaking, last round we allready had other races with higher armor and faster initiative and if we're going to remove their cloaking advantage then we might aswell beef them up with armor or remove them since they're obsolete.
__________________
[InSomnia]
Official designated driver

[ToF] - [eXilition] - [Rock] - [Denial] - [DLR] - [eVolution] - [ODDR] - [HR] - [Ultores] - [Apprime] - [Ironborn]

Last edited by Veedeejem!; 10 Mar 2008 at 10:06.
Veedeejem! is offline   Reply With Quote